The greatest WordPress.com site in all the land!
- Subscribe: Digital / Home Delivery
- Log In
- Register Now
- The New York Times is so fucked up, so very… Oops…I am their subscriber (Digital variety) by automatic bank deduction (FirstNiagara) of $35.00 per month. Every time I try to ‘login,’ their system rejects me. Their customer service has not responded to my pleadings, several times.
- This is my response:
NYT, GoFuCkYoMaMa. Just do it!
By BILL BISHOP- …and I am Sid Harth
China 中国 Insider March 25, 2013, 5:10 pm 8 Comments
A Highly Public Trip for China’s President, and Its First Lady
Thomas Mukoya/ReutersPresident Xi Jinping of China in Tanzania on Monday.
President Xi Jinping of China is on his inaugural overseas trip. Mr. Xi stopped first in Russia, went to Tanzania, and will then visit the Republic of Congo and South Africa, where he will also attend a summit meeting of emerging BRICS economies — Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa.His visit to Russia yielded “breakthrough” oil deals, an agreement to buy 24 Su-35 fighters and four Lada-class submarines, a commitment to strengthen defense ties and a pledge for more cooperation on tourism. The Chinese and Russian leaders apparently got along quite well, as Mr. Xi told President Vladimir Putin that their “souls are open to each other”.
China and Russia have a history of mutual distrust, and we should view the happy talk of closer ties with some skepticism, though dismissing it as a “nothingburger of an event” may be a bit too flip. The two countries have many shared interests, including a desire to stymie United States influence and, for China at least, counter the United States “pivot” to Asia.
Mr. Xi visits Africa with trade between China and the continent worth more than $200 billion a year. In Tanzania on Monday, he said China wanted a “relationship of equals,” remarks aimed at countering the growing sentiment that China is exploiting the continent. At the BRICS meeting Mr. Xi may “endorse plans to create a joint foreign exchange reserves pool” that theoretically could help emerging market countries lessen reliance on the World Bank and International Monetary Fund.
Thomas Mukoya/ReutersPeng Liyuan, China’s new first lady, with Salma Kikwete, Tanzania’s first lady.
Peng Liyuan, the president’s wife, has been an unexpected star of the trip. Mrs. Peng, a singer who holds the rank of major general in the People’s Liberation Army and is known for her patriotic songs, is China’s most glamorous and public first lady in a long time. Pictures of her on the trip lit up Chinese social media and her fashion choices, all Chinese brands, should be both a boon to the designers and a message to other Chinese officials and their spouses that homegrown brands are more appropriate than foreign, luxury ones.The “Chinese Dream” is a concept that the new leadership has been promoting, both domestically and internationally. The domestic version ties together national rejuvenation, improvement of people’s livelihoods, prosperity, construction of a better society and military strengthening as the common dream of the Chinese people that can be best achieved under one party, Socialist rule.
The official, global version of the Chinese Dream:
will benefit not only the Chinese people, but also people of all countries. The Chinese dream is not a call for revanchism and Chinese nationalism at the expense of its neighbors. It is the dream of China, which once suffered invasions and turmoil, to maintain lasting peace.Continued economic growth is the sine qua non of the Chinese Dream. A new report by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development forecasts that China’s economy can continue grow at 8 percent a year through 2020 if it enacts many of the reforms that Beijing has already repeatedly said it intends to. At the China Development Forum in Beijing over the weekend, the vice premier and Politburo standing committee member, Zhang Gaoli, reiterated the government’s resolve in pushing through difficult reforms.
Stable relations with the United States are also important to the realization of the Chinese Dream. Perhaps to underscore that although Mr. Xi’s first, heavily publicized overseas trip is to Russia and Africa, Monday night’s CCTV Evening News broadcast showed Henry Kissinger meeting with Premier Li Keqiang and former Secretary of Defense William Cohen meeting with Mr. Zhang. Premier Li stressed the importance of the United States-China relationship and reiterated China’s desire for a “new type of great power relationship” while the vice premier pledged fairness for foreign companies.
APPLE MAY WANT TO TAKE MR. ZHANG UP on his fairness pledge. On March 15, CCTV claimed that Apple’s support policies discriminate against Chinese consumers. Last week, Xinhua bemoaned the mindless consumption of Apple products by Wuhan students in “Apple pursuit lures 20,000 students into high-interest loans.” And Monday morning, The People’s Daily criticized the company for both its support policies and its public relations response, even going so far as to mock the response with a cartoon.
As of last quarter, China is Apple’s second-biggest and fastest-growing market. It is not clear whether these official media attacks are part of a broader attack on an American company whose size and success may make Beijing uncomfortable.
In the United States, you would never see a government official using a Huawei device, but a fair number of Chinese ones use Apple products. So far, there have not been official media calls for government workers to stop using Apple devices, though the crackdown on corruption may have dented purchases of iPhones and iPads intended for gifts.
When Apple reports earnings April 23, we should learn whether Apple’s Chinese dream is still on track.
Bill Bishop publishes the daily Sinocism China Newsletter from Beijing. You can follow him on Twitter @niubi and Sina Weibo @billbishop.
Tags
Apple Inc, China, Defense and Military Forces, Economic Conditions and Trends, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Peng Liyuan, Xi Jinping, Zhang Gaoli- plang1
- rhode island
china thanks to the incredible failure of obama is now the worlds leading power and has simply ordering obama there to give hi instructions on what they want done with the countries budget…..- franks289
- LA
But iPhones are made in China! Add to that recent article ” Apple supplier Foxconn has record profit” why the complaints? They make BMW X6s in the USA but I can’t afford to buy one. Do they discriminate against American buyers?- Goubulibaozi
- Australia
Apple is probably in the final throes of negotiations with China’s largest carrier China Mobile (700 million customers) to carry the iPhone on its 4G LTE network to be launched later this year. The majority shareholder in China Mobile is the government.
Few in the media outside China are tying the China Mobile negotiations possibility to this negative coordinated reporting when I find it a strong likelihood given the launch of the China Mobile 4G LTE network later this year and the need to test handsets months ahead of the launch, recent loss of customers to iPhone carrying networks of two domestic competitors, and previous expressions over the last 3 years that they wanted to carry the iPhone but are blocked from officials.
In other words China Mobile leaders have pleaded they are out of time & excuses to the government. This is a top down directed effort and “not up” from the millions of satisfied consumers in China.
The new political leadership in China is just in office and they will be cautious and careful on signing off.
The media campaign costs very little compared to what is to be gained.
It is also short-sighted that China’s sovereign wealth fund (CIC) has not invested in Apple and embraced some of the consumer demand for Apple products in China while also earning profits for the country.- franks289
- LA
But, iphones (and many others) are made in china, at a factory with conditions and competive wages (for china) such that tens of thousands line up to apply for new openings.
So shouldn’t we be complaining that a US official uses an iPhone or any other made in China device?- Richmond
- San Francisco, CA
You’re complaining because China is bad-mouthing American products like Apple? Isn’t that all Americans do with anything from China? You call that fair? What a bunch of cry-babies! Sorry to tell you Chinese slave labor makes Apple products and in turn Apple products cost the most in the world in China and according to this article that’s unfair to point out? And you wonder with that kind of thinking why the world hates the US?- March 26, 2013 at 10:43 a.m.
- Recommended1
- JamesLG
- Honolulu
We, the humans of this planet, are facing a life threatening crisis because of the massive climate changes we are causing – by the combined effects of overpopulation and the continued burning of Coal, Oil, and Natural Gas.
We no longer should be using any of our resources or the planet’s resources to manufacture weapons of war. To do so is simply to admit that we have not created anything that qualifies as a sane civilization. To do so is courting certain disaster, not just through the possibility of a devastating war, but through the certain devastation that will result from ignoring the impending perils of Global Warming.
The leaders of China, Russia, and the US must realize this soon, and cooperate to save the only planet we all have.
Stop the foolish power games. We will only kill ourselves and everything else on the planet.- Newfie
- Newfoundland
Economic growth is fuelled by fossil fuels. Burning fossil fuels is destabilizing the climate. An unstable climate will not support large scale agriculture, the basis of civilization. Connect the dots…
We evolved for millions of years as hunter-gatherers. Our genes are thus optimized for short term thinking. We can’t think far enough ahead to avoid the consequences of burning fossil fuels.
Industrial civilization is doomed…
Reason.com
Free Minds & Free Markets
- inShare
- Send to Kindle
What’s Worse, The New York Times‘ Sinophobia or Sinophilia?
Matt Welch|Jan. 13, 2010 10:51 amFrom the blame-China files, comes this editorial in yesterday’s paper pinning the world’s economic problems to Beijing’s currency policies:
While the strategy is still working for China, it is exacerbating economic weakness around the globe. If China keeps it up, other countries are likely to use their last available weapon — protectionism — to stop the onslaught of artificially cheap Chinese goods. A trade war is easy to start and hard to contain. [...]This follows a New Year’s shot across the bow from econo-columnist Paul Krugman:
As China has flooded the world with exports, it has edged out suppliers from other developing countries. This was bad enough when the world economy was growing briskly.
Now China’s strategy is doing considerably more harm. In many countries, fiscal stimulus efforts have been weakened by inflows of cheap Chinese imports that have soaked up some of the money added by these government programs. [...]
If China continues its beggar-thy-neighbor currency policy, it will make it even harder for countries and the global economy to revive. As overextended governments wind down their fiscal stimulus, many economies will have to rely on exports as a crucial source of demand while their consumers restructure their sorry personal finances.
China has become a major financial and trade power. But it doesn’t act like other big economies. Instead, it follows a mercantilist policy, keeping its trade surplus artificially high. And in today’s depressed world, that policy is, to put it bluntly, predatory. [...]Then, just when you’re ready to imagine the entire NYT opinion section doing voice-overs for 1960s Jell-O commercials or body doubles for 1980s David Bowie videos, along comes authoritarian-apologist Thomas L. Friedman, doubling down on his offensive/idiotic claim that the Chinese political system is better than ours:
[T]hat trade surplus drains much-needed demand away from a depressed world economy. My back-of-the-envelope calculations suggest that for the next couple of years Chinese mercantilism may end up reducing U.S. employment by around 1.4 million jobs.
[O]ther countries are taking (modest) protectionist measures precisely because China refuses to let its currency rise. And more such measures are entirely appropriate. [...]
[T]here’s the claim that protectionism is always a bad thing, in any circumstances. If that’s what you believe, however, you learned Econ 101 from the wrong people — because when unemployment is high and the government can’t restore full employment, the usual rules don’t apply.
I am reluctant to sell China short, not because I think it has no problems or corruption or bubbles, but because I think it has all those problems in spades — and some will blow up along the way (the most dangerous being pollution). But it also has a political class focused on addressing its real problems, as well as a mountain of savings with which to do so (unlike us).Unlike Friedman, I’ve never read “The Herald Tribune over breakfast in Hong Kong harbor,” let alone put that in the lede of a column (though I will take this opportunity to reiterate my complaint that the IHT really sucks œuf à la coque compared to its past glory now that it’s basically The New York Times International), but hick intuition tells me that a regime that depends on restricting the freedom of its own people is by definition not addressing its “real problems,” but rather putting them off for a day of unpredictable reckoning. Meanwhile, blaming another country for America’s woes strikes me as, at the bare minimum, weak.
Sinophobia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaThis article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. This article needs additional citations for verification. (April 2008) This article may contain original research. (August 2007)
Sinophobia (from Late LatinSinae“Cina” + Greekφόβος, phobos, “fear”) or anti-Chinese sentiment is the fear of or dislike of China, its people, overseas Chinese, or Chinese culture.[1] It often targets Chinese minorities living outside of China and is complicated by the dilemma of immigration, development of national identity in neighbouring countries, disparity of wealth, fall of the past central tribute system and majority-minority relations. Its opposite is Sinophilia.Part of a series on Discrimination Specific forms Discrimination portal Contents
Region-based Sinophobia
Results of 2012 BBC World Service poll.
Views of China’s influence by country[2]Country polled Positive Negative Neutral Pos-Neg United States 42% 46% 12% -4% Canada 53% 36% 11% 17% France 38% 49% 13% -11% United Kingdom 57% 32% 11% 25% Germany 42% 47% 11% -5% Spain 39% 48% 13% -9% Russia 46% 21% 33% 25% China 86% 5% 9% 81% South Korea 33% 64% 3% -31% Japan 10% 50% 40% -40% India 30% 31% 39% -1% Indonesia 51% 26% 23% 25% Pakistan 76% 7% 17% 69% Brazil 48% 31% 21% 17% Mexico 37% 37% 26% 0% Chile 53% 18% 29% 35% Australia 61% 29% 10% 32% Peru 50% 21% 29% 29% Egypt 50% 25% 25% 25% Nigeria 89% 7% 4% 82% Kenya 75% 16% 9% 59% Ghana 64% 10% 26% 54% East Asia
Hong Kong
Main articles: Hong Kong independence movement and Early 2012 Hong Kong protestsJapan
Main article: Anti-Chinese sentiment in JapanAfter World War II ended, the relationship between China and Japan gradually improved. However, since 2000, Japan has seen a gradual resurgence of anti-Chinese sentiments. Many Japanese believe that China is using the issue of the countries’ checkered history, such as the Japanese history textbook controversies and official visits to the Yasukuni Shrine, both as a diplomatic card and to make Japan a scapegoat in domestic politics.[3] The Anti-Japanese Riots in Spring of 2005 also were a source of more anger towards China within the Japanese public. Anti-Chinese sentiments in Japan have been on a sharp rise since 2002. According to Pew Global Attitude Project (2008), unfavorable view of China was 84%, unfavorable view of Chinese people was 73%.[4]
Overseas Chinese living in Japan are often stereotyped as being criminals or potential criminals, even prone to violent behavior. They are also stereotyped as being illegal immigrants.[5]Korea
Main article: Anti-Chinese sentiment in KoreaPre-1945
China and Korea have a long history of conflict. Conventionally, it is believed the Chinese see as Koreans part of a sinocentric East Asian regional order.[6] that emphasizes a hierarchy where China is at the top. Korean rejection of this hierarchy lead to a conflict of existential identities, threatening the traditional Korean and Chinese identities. Koreans and Chinese engage in a relationship of negative interdependence, potentially comparable to Israeli–Palestinian conflict.[6]
During the Three Kingdoms Period (57 BCE – 668), the Goguryeo Empire of Korea was attacked by many Chinese dynasties, including the Han, Wei, Yan, Sui, and Tang Dynasty. In the 7th century, the Baekje and Silla kingdoms were raided by the Chinese Tang Dynasty. This caused historical resentment between the two groups.[7] In the 9th century, Chinese pirates and slave traders captured foreigners to sell as slaves in China. The Korean peninsula was a primary target because of its close proximity.[8][9] The Korean admiral Jang Bogo established of Cheonghaejin garrison, and Jang’s force sweep the Chinese pirates from the western coast of Korea.[9] During the early Ming period, China demanded tributes of rare animals, food, concubines[10] and eunuchs[11] as tribute from the Korean Joseon Dynasty.
In 1592, JapaninvadedKorea and occupied many parts of the peninsula within months. The Korean court requested and received aid from China. Chinese soldiers were sometimes indistinguishable from Japanese enemies, and China took advantage of this to loot properties and kill Koreans. These actions gave more cause for anti-Chinese sentiment.[12][13]
In 1931, while Korea was dominated by Imperial Japan, there was a dispute between Chinese and Korean farmers in Wanpaoshan, Manchuria. It was highly sensationalized in the Japanese and Korean press, and used as propaganda to increase anti-Chinese sentiment. It caused a series of anti-Chinese riots throughout Korea, starting in Incheon on July 3 and spreading rapidly to other cities. The Chinese claimed that 146 people were killed, 546 wounded, and a considerable number of properties were destroyed. The worst riot occurred in Pyongyang on July 5. In this effect, the Japanese had a considerable influence on sinophobia in Korea.[14]Post-1945
In the 1960s, South Korean laws directed against foreign property ownership, at a time when most foreign ownership was by ethnic Chinese, led to many Chinese emigrating from South Korea.[15]
Anti-Chinese sentiments in South Korea have been on a steady rise since 2002. According to Pew Global Attitude Project, favorable view of China steadily declined from 66% in 2002 to 48% in 2008, while unfavorable view of China rose from 31% in 2002 to 49% in 2008.[16] According to polls by East Asia Institute, positive view of China’s influence declined from 48.6% in 2005 to 38% in 2009, while negative view of Chinese influence rose from 46.7% in 2005 to 50% in 2008.[17]
The turning point of rising anti-Chinese sentiments was the Northeast Project, a controversial Chinese government research project claiming Goguryeo and other various Korean kingdoms, including Gojoseon, Buyeo and Balhae, to be Chinese local states and thus part of historical Chinese territory. The conflict erupted after the Chinese Foreign Ministry in April deleted references of the kingdom from the introduction of Korean history on its Web site and that deletion angered many Koreans. Beijing refused to accept Seoul’s demand to restore on its Foreign Ministry Web site the part on Korean history including the ancient kingdom. Many historians and officials in Korea believed the row is at a critical stage in diplomatic relations, with Chinese defiance of Korean requests to reinstate acknowledgment of Goguryeo as a Korean kingdom being seen by Seoul as humiliating and threatening to unravel ties between the two neighbors. This sparked a massive uproar in South Korea when the project was widely publicized in 2004.[18] Amid intensifying criticism against China from the Korean government and public, China dispatched its new Vice Foreign Minister Wu Dawei to Seoul with the Beijing’s promise not to distort the Goguryeo history in its textbooks.
During the Seoul leg of the 2008 Olympic torch relay, over 6,000 Chinese students clashed with protesters.[18][19][20] Chinese demonstrators clashed with local activists who rallied to protest the torch relay, citing Beijing’s discouraging treatment of North Korea defectors and the regime’s crackdown on Tibetans‘ rioting for independence.[19] With the result of these violence clashes in central Seoul, anti-Chinese sentiments in Korea aroused great indignation toward the Chinese people.[21] The Ministry of Justice of South Korea indicated that it would punish all such demonstrators, regardless of nationality.[22] The Government of South Korea is toughening visa regulations for Chinese students.[23]
There are also other issues that negatively affected sentiments towards China in Korea, such as Made in China controversies, Chinese fishboats illegally trespassing South Korean territorial waters, Political cronyism toward North Korean dictatorship, and Korean point on Anti-Korean sentiment in China.
Overseas Chinese living in South Korea are often stereotyped as being criminals or potential criminals.[citation needed]South Asia
India
Anti-Chinese sentiment in India began soon after India’s defeat in the war between India and China in 1962. Recently, the competition between India and China on economic and military fronts as well as territorial dispute between the two nations and with China supporting Pakistan in Kashmir have contributed a lot to anti-Chinese sentiment.[24]Southeast Asia
Anti-Chinese sentiment in Southeast Asian countries is often rooted in: historical factors; a perceived lack of assimilation; and/or a socio-economic divide. Chinese traders from the coast of mainland China and refugees of the Punti-Hakka Clan Wars in China emigrated throughout Southeast Asia countries[citation needed] and eventually became the majority population of Singapore, a large minority in Malaysia and Thailand, and small (less than 5% of the total population) minority groups in other Southeast Asian countries. A tradition of trading and reliance on the Chinese community enabled them to prosper in these countries.[citation needed] This perceived clannish attitude and lack of assimilation among the immigrants and their descendants and the ethnic group’s relative wealth and success fueled Sinophobic sentiment.[citation needed] One study of the Chinese as a so-called “market-dominant minority” notes that “Chinese market dominance and intense resentment amongst the indigenous majority is characteristic of virtually every country in Southeast Asia”.[25] Additionally, in the post-World War II years when much of Southeast Asia gained political independence from the West, Communist insurgencies arose in many countries of the region. All the main Communist rebel groups in Southeast Asia were headed by ethnic Chinese.[citation needed] Sinophobia is also codified in some Southeast Asian countries. The anti-Chinese legislation was in the Indonesian constitution until 1998.Mainland Southeast Asia
Vietnam
Due to a thousand years of Chinese occupation and recent territory disputes in the Paracel and Spratly Islands, there are anti-Chinese sentiments among the Vietnamese population.[26][27] While the government tries to maintain friendly ties with the Chinese government by cracking down on anti-Chinese demonstrations and criticisms regarding China, anti-Chinese sentiments had spiked in 2007 after China formed an administration in the disputed islands,[27] in 2009 when the Vietnamese government allowed the Chinese aluminium manufacturer Chinalco the rights to mine for bauxite in the Central Highlands,[28][29][30] and when Vietnamese fishermen were detained by Chinese security forces while seeking refuge in the disputed territories.[31] In 2011, following a spat in which a Chinese Marine Surveillance ship damaged a Vietnamese geologic survey ship off the coast of Vietnam, some Vietnamese travel agencies boycotted Chinese destinations or refused to serve customers with Chinese citizenship.[32] Hundreds of people protested in front of the Chinese embassy in Hanoi and the Chinese consulate in Ho Chi Minh City against Chinese naval operations in the South China Sea before being dispersed by the police.[33]
The Sino-Vietnamese War resulted in the discrimination and consequent emigration of the country’s ethnic Chinese, many of whom fled as “boat people“. From 1978 to 1979, some 450,000 ethnic Chinese left Vietnam by boat (mainly former South Vietnam citizens fleeing the Vietcong) as refugees or were expelled across the land border with China.[34]
According to journalist Daniel Groos, Sinophobia is omnipresent in modern Vietnam, where “from school kids to government officials, China-bashing is very much in vogue.” According to Groos a majority of Vietnamese resent the import and usage of Chinese products, considering them distinctly low status.[35]Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar and Thailand
In Cambodia, Laos, and Myanmar, anti-Chinese sentiment is frequently associated with Chinese businesses that are perceived to be responsible for destroying or ‘stealing’ the country’s natural resources, or who are responsible for the relocation of citizens from their homes to make way for companies seeking to use the land.[36]
In Cambodia in the late 1960s an estimated 425,000 ethnic Chinese lived in Cambodia. By 1984, as a result of the Khmer Rouge genocide and emigration, only about 61,400 Chinese remained in the country.[37][38][39]
Thailand is generally considered to be Sinophilic. However, in the 1950s, upon learning of an ethnic Chinese Communist plot to overthrow the government, several restrictions were placed on Chinese and their intra-community assembling.[40]Insular Southeast Asia
Indonesia and Malaysia
As with every one of their non-Chinese neighbors, the countries of the Malay Archipelago have an overseas Chinese community with which the local majority occasionally conflicts.
This asymmetrical economic position has incited anti-Chinese sentiment among the poorer majorities. Sometimes the anti-Chinese attitudes turn violent, such as the May 13 Incident in Malaysia in 1969 and the Jakarta riots of May 1998 in Indonesia,[41] in which more than 2,000 people died. During the colonial era, some riots killed tens of thousands of Chinese.[42][43][44][45][46] During the Indonesian killings of 1965–66, in which more than 500,000 people died,[47] ethnic Chinese were killed and their properties looted and burned as a result of anti-Chinese racism on the excuse that Dipa “Amat” Aidit had brought the PKI closer to China.[48][49] In the May 1998 riots of Indonesia following the fall of President Suharto, many ethnic Chinese were targeted by Indonesian rioters, resulting in a large number of rapes and looting.Pacific
In 2000, Tongan noble Tu’ivakano of Nukunuku banned Chinese stores from his Nukunuku District in Tonga. This followed complaints from other shopkeepers regarding competition from local Chinese.[50] In 2001, Tonga’s Chinese community (a population of about three or four thousand people) was hit by a wave racist assaults[citation needed]. The Tongan government did not renew the work permits of more than 600 Chinese storekeepers, and has admitted the decision was in response to “widespread anger at the growing presence of the storekeepers”.[51]
In 2006, rioters damaged shops owned by Chinese-Tongans in Nukuʻalofa.[52][53]
In 2006, Honiara‘s Chinatown suffered damage when it was looted and burned by rioters following a contested election. Ethnic Chinese businessmen were falsely blamed for bribing members of the Solomon Islands‘ Parliament. The government of Taiwan was the one that supported the then current government of the Soloman Islands. The Chinese businessmen were mainly small traders from mainland China and had no interest in local politics.[52]Central Asia
Mongolia
Mongolians traditionally hold very unfavorable views of China. The common stereotype is that China is trying to undermine Mongolian sovereignty in order to eventually make it part of China (the Republic of China has claimed Mongolia as part of its territory, see Outer Mongolia ). Fear and hatred of erliiz (literally, double seeds), a derogatory term for people of mixed Han Chinese and Mongol ethnicity,[54] is a common phenomena in Mongolian politics. Erliiz are seen as a Chinese plot of “genetic pollution” to chip away at Mongolian sovereignty, and allegations of Chinese ancestry are used as a political weapon in election campaigns – though not always with success.[55][56] Several Neo-Nazi groups opposing foreign influence, especially China’s, are present within Mongolia.[57]Russia
In Russia’s Siberia and the Russian Far East, there formerely was a long-standing dispute over territory, which was resolved in 2004. Russia and China officially no longer have territorial disputes and China does not claim land in Russia, however, there is also a perceived fear of a demographic takeover by Chinese immigrants in sparsely populated Russian areas.[58][59]Western world
See also: Yellow Peril and Stereotypes of East Asians in the Western worldLike China’s perception in other countries, China’s large population, long history and size has been the subject of fear somewhat. China has figured in the Western imagination in a number of different ways as being a very large civilization existing for many centuries with a very large population; however the weakness of China in the beginning of the modern age, rise of People’s Republic of China after the Chinese Civil War has dramatically changed the perception of China from a relatively positive light to negative because of the fear of communism in the West, and repeated public accusations against China of human rights abuses.Cover of the third edition of G. G. Rupert‘s The Yellow Peril, depicting Uncle Sam engaged in a sword fight with a stereotypical pigtailed Chinese warrior.
The European view towards China from the exotic descriptions of The Travels of Marco Polo developed into a patronising superiority as the West (later including Japan) attempted to extend their colonial empires into China. Successful attempts in exporting opium into the Chinese Empire and a series of other commercial and military successes exposed to colonial powers a political fact: China’s culture appeared glorious, but its government showed weaknesses that could be exploited for commercial and cultural gain.[citation needed]
Sinophobia became more common as China was becoming a major source of immigrants for the west (including the American West).[60] Numerous Chinese immigrants to North America were attracted by wages offered by large railway companies in the late 19th century as the companies built the transcontinental railroads.
Sinophobic policies (such as the Chinese Exclusion Act, the Chinese Immigration Act of 1923, anti-Chinese zoning laws and restrictive covenants, the policies of Richard Seddon, and the White Australia policy) and pronouncements on the “yellow peril” were in evidence as late as the mid-20th century in the Australia, United States, Canada, and New Zealand.Australia
The Chinese population was active in political and social life in Australia. Community leaders protested against discriminatory legislation and attitudes, and despite the passing of the Immigration Restriction Act in 1901, Chinese communities around Australia participated in parades and celebrations of Australia’s Federation and the visit of the Duke and Duchess of York.
Although the Chinese communities in Australia were generally peaceful and industrious, resentment flared up against them because of their different customs and traditions. In the mid-19th century, terms such as “dirty, disease ridden, [and] insect-like” were used in Australia and New Zealand to describe the Chinese.[61]
A poll tax was passed in Victoria in 1855 to restrict Chinese immigration. New South Wales, Queensland, and Western Australia followed suit. Such legislation did not distinguish between naturalised, British citizens, Australian-born and Chinese-born individuals. The tax in Victoria and New South Wales was repealed in the 1860s, but by the 1880s there was another wave of anti-Chinese sentiment. Despite a steady decline in the number of Chinese residents in Australia, the numbers of Chinese and Chinese-Australians in the more visible Chinatowns of Melbourne and Sydney were growing. In 1887, two Chinese Commissioners, the first statesmen from China to visit Australia, arrived to assess the living conditions of Chinese in Australia after numerous requests from Chinese living abroad. In 1888, following protests and strike actions, an inter-colonial conference agreed to reinstate and increase the severity of restrictions on Chinese immigration. This provided the basis for the 1901 Immigration Restriction Act and the seed for the White Australia Policy, which although relaxed over time, was not fully abandoned until the early 1970s. This claim requires a citation.Canada
In 1850s, sizable numbers of Chinese immigrants came to British Columbia seeking gold; the region was known to them as Gold Mountain. Starting in 1858, Chinese“coolies” were brought to Canada to work in the mines and on the Canadian Pacific Railway. However, they were denied by law the rights of citizenship, including the right to vote, and in the 1880s, “head taxes” were implemented to curtail immigration from China. In 1907, a riot in Vancouver targeted Chinese and Japanese-owned businesses. In 1923, the federal government passed the Chinese Immigration Act, commonly known as the Exclusion Act, prohibiting further Chinese immigration except under “special circumstances”. The Exclusion Act was repealed in 1947, the same year in which Chinese Canadians were given the right to vote. Restrictions would continue to exist on immigration from Asia until 1967, when all racial restrictions on immigration to Canada were repealed, and Canada adopted the current points based immigration system. On June 22, 2006, Prime Minister Stephen Harper offered an apology and compensation only for the head tax once paid by Chinese immigrants.[62] Survivors or their spouses were paid approximately CAD$20,000 in compensation.[63]United States
Main article: Anti-Chinese sentiment in the United StatesStarting with the California Gold Rush in the late 19th century, the United States—particularly the West Coast states—imported large numbers of Chinese migrant laborers. Early Chinese immigrant worked as gold miners, and later on subsequent large labor projects, such as the building of the First Transcontinental Railroad. The decline of the Qing Dynasty in China caused many Chinese to emigrate overseas in search of a more stable life, and this coincided with the rapid growth of American industry. The Chinese were considered by employers as “reliable” workers who would continue working, without complaint, even under destitute conditions.[64]A political cartoon criticizing the United States’ protest of the anti-Jewish pogroms in the Russian Empire despite the Chinese Exclusion Act.[verification needed]
Chinese migrant workers encountered considerable prejudice in the United States, especially by the people who occupied the lower layers in white society, because Chinese “coolies” were used as a scapegoat for depressed wage levels by politicians and labor leaders.[65] Cases of physical assaults on the Chinese include the Chinese massacre of 1871 in Los Angeles and the murder of Vincent Chin. The 1909 murder of Elsie Sigel in New York, of which a Chinese person was suspected, was blamed on the Chinese in general and led to physical violence. “The murder of Elsie Sigel immediately grabbed the front pages of newspapers, which portrayed Chinese men as dangerous to “innocent” and “virtuous” young white women. This murder led to a surge in the harassment of Chinese in communities across the United States.”[66]
Italian-Americans and Irish-Americans, who had once been subject to similar prejudice themselves, were often involved in such assaults, believing that their condition had been worsened by the influx of Chinese laborers.[citation needed]
The emerging American trade unions, under such leaders as Samuel Gompers, also took an outspoken anti-Chinese position,[67] regarding Chinese laborers as competitors to white laborers. Only with the emergence of the international trade union, IWW, did trade unionists start to accept Chinese workers as part of the American working-class.[68]
In the 1870s and 1880s various legal discriminatory measures were taken against the Chinese. These laws, in particular the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882, were aimed at restricting further immigration from China.[69] although the laws were later repealed by the Chinese Exclusion Repeal Act of 1943. In particular, even in his lone dissent against Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), then-Supreme Court Justice John Marshall Harlan wrote of the Chinese as: “a race so different from our own that we do not permit those belonging to it to become citizens of the United States. Persons belonging to it are, with few exceptions, absolutely excluded from our country. I allude to the Chinese race.”[70]In the United States elections, 2010, a significant number[72] of negative advertisements from both major political parties focused on a candidates’ alleged support for free trade with China. Some of the stock images that accompanied ominous voiceovers about China were actually of Chinatown, San Francisco.[73] In particular, an advertisement by the Citizens Against Government Waste called “Chinese Professor,” which portrays a 2030 conquest of the West by China, used local Asian American extras to play Chinese although the actors were not informed of the nature of the shoot.[74] Columnist Jeff Yang said that in the campaign there was a “blurry line between Chinese and Chinese-Americans“.[73] Larry McCarthy, the producer of “Chinese Professor,” defended his work by saying that “this ad is about America, it’s not about China.”[75] Other editorials commenting on the video have called the video not anti-Chinese.[72][75][76] One of the extra actors who took part in the ad reported that he was lied to by the producers who told him they were filming a scene for Transformers 3.[77] The same actor said “I saw the commercial and it’s pretty intense and one thing I did not know that the commercial would do, is put this almost red-scare type of fear in the eyes of Americans (effectiveness wise, the political ad works, not saying I agree with the tactics).”[78] Chinese were baffled by the ad, especially by its exaggeration of Chinese economic power, given the fact that the average Chinese citizen st earns less than one-fifth of that is earned by an American citizen.[79]
Read more: http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/evanosnos/2012/11/the-year-that-china-bashing-went-mainstream.html#ixzz2LMMigUL1Africa
Zambia
Multiple presidential candidate Michael Sata has often invoked harsh rhetoric against the Chinese commercial presence in Africa’s largest copper producing country. Though he failed to win elections thrice, he won the 2011 election. Despite toning down his rhetoric, the investment climate for Zambia was read as uncertain.[80]Historical sinophobia-led violence
List of non-Chinese “sinophobia-led” violence against ethnic Chinese (i.e., Han Chinese, Overseas Chinese, and Zhonghua minzu)By Americans
- Chinese massacre of 1871
- Rock Springs massacre
- Issaquah riot of 1885
- Tacoma riot of 1885
- Seattle riot of 1886
- Anti-Chinese violence in Washington
By Australians
By Canadians
By Dutch
By Indonesians
Especially From Several Clan Like Hu,Deng,Xi,Etc Anti China is country specific than Anti Chinese- Mobilize World People Invisible Anti China in Indonesia
- Play off against, Turn upside down, fake, impersonations, etc
- Make One Against Another, Play off One against Others, impersonations, etc
- Satelite, Internet, Supernatural, Block Jobs, Block Opportunities, etc
- May 1998 riots of Anti Chinese in Indonesia
- 1960s riots of Anti Chinese in Indonesia
- 1950s riots of Anti Chinese in Indonesia
- 1940s riots of Anti Chinese in Indonesia
- 1800s riots of Anti Chinese in Indonesia
By Japanese
By Koreans
See also
References
- ^[1]. The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Online Edition. Retrieved 2012-07-12.
- ^BBC World Service poll, Mostly Positive vs. Mostly Negative views regarding the influence of various countries. 24,090 citizens in 22 countries, were interviewed face-to-face or by telephone between 6 December 2011 and 17 February 2012.
- ^ Matthew Forney, “Why China Loves to Hate Japan”. Time Magazine, December 10, 2005. http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1139759,00.html, accessed 1 June 2008
- ^24-Nation Pew Global Attitudes Survey(2008) 35p, Pew Research
- ^CNN. 2000-04-24 http://cgi.cnn.com/ASIANOW/time/magazine/2000/0424/cover1.html.
- ^ abGries, Peter Hays. The Koguryo Controversy, National Identity, and Sino-Korean relations Today. p. 14.
- ^ Kang Man-gil (2002). Doubts about the Korean history. Seohae Munjip. p. 14. ISBN 89-7483-165-1.
- ^ Edward H. Schafer (1963). The golden peaches of Samarkand: a study of Tʻang exotics. University of California Press. p. 44. ISBN 0-520-05462-8. Retrieved 2011-01-09.
- ^ ab“장보고” (in Korean). Naver/Doosan Encyclopedia.
- ^ By Frederick W. Mote, Denis Twitchett, John King Fairbank (1988). The Cambridge history of China: The Ming dynasty, 1368-1644, Part 1. Cambridge University Press. p. 301. ISBN 0-521-24332-7. Retrieved 2011-01-11.
- ^ Shih-shan Henry Tsai (1996). The eunuchs in the Ming dynasty. SUNY Press. p. 16. ISBN 0-7914-2687-4. Retrieved 2010-06-28.
- ^ Frederick W. Mote, Denis Twitchett, John King Fairbank. The Cambridge history of China: The Ming dynasty, 1368-1644, Part 2, pp. 298-299. at Google Books
- ^“Imjin War and Ming Chinese army”, Han Myeong-gi, The library of National Assembly of Korea
- ^“만보산사건” (in Korean). Naver/Doosan Encyclopedia.
- ^ Kim, Kwang-ok (2004), “Chinese in Korea”, in Ember, Melvin; Ember, Carol R.; Skoggard, Ian A., Encyclopedia of diasporas: immigrant and refugee cultures around the world, Springer, pp. 688–697, ISBN 978-0-306-48321-9
- ^ World Public Opinion surveys, 2002-2008 http://www.worldpublicopinion.org
- ^ East Asia Institute Foreign Perception Survey 2005-2009, some in collaboration with BBC World Service Polls 2005-2008 http://www.eai.or.kr
- ^ ab Song Sang-ho (2010-04-04). “Chinese student faces arrest for Seoul torch relay violence”. The Korea Herald.
- ^ Lee, Gil-seong (이길성); Won, Jeong-hwan (원정환) (2008-04-29). “중국인들 집단 폭력에 멍들어버린 서울” [Seoul bruised by the Chinese mob's organized assaults] (in Korean). The Chosun Ilbo.
- ^“중국인 시위대 폭력행위… ‘비난여론’ 거세” [Chinese protesters' violence… Growing ‘criticism’in Korea] (in Korean). JKSTARS.COM. 2008-04-28.
- ^ Song Sang-ho (2010-04-04). “Seoul to punish Chinese torch demonstrators”. The Korea Herald.
- ^ Shin Jeong-won (2008-04-30). “정부 “중국인 비자 발급 엄격하게 하겠다”" (in Korean). Newsis.
- ^http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/india-china-media-farooq-abdullah-attack/1/165281.html
- ^ Chua. (2003). pg. 61.
- ^ Martha Ann Overland (2009-04-16). “In Vietnam, New Fears of a Chinese ‘Invasion’”. Time Magazine. Retrieved 2009-10-27.
- ^ ab Agence France-Presse (2007-12-16). “Vietnamese in second anti-China rally over disputed islands”. The Australian. Retrieved 2009-10-27.
- ^ Agence France Presse (2009-04-20). “Vietnam’s China mining plans spark rare criticism”. AsianOne News. Retrieved 2009-10-27.
- ^“Vietnam’s nationalist bloggers: Getting if off your chest”. The Economist. 2009-09-10. Retrieved 2009-10-27.
- ^ Martha Ann Overland (2009-09-05). “Vietnam to Its Journalists: Don’t Tread on China”. Time Magazine. Retrieved 2009-10-27.
- ^ Nga Pham (2009-08-12). “China releases Vietnam fishermen”. BBC News. Retrieved 2009-10-27.
- ^“Tourist Agencies Abandon China”. Radio Free Asia. 2011-06-03.
- ^“Vietnamese hold anti-Chinese protest”. BBC News. 2011-06-05. Retrieved 2011-06-05.
- ^ Griffin, Kevin. Vietnamese. Discover Vancouver.
- ^ Gross, Daniel. Cheap Trade. Newsweek.
- ^http://asian-power.com/project/more-news/chinese-firm-heeds-protests-stop-cambodian-hydro-projects
- ^Genocide – Cambodia
- ^The Cambodian Genocide and International Law
- ^Cambodia the Chinese
- ^http://www.onwar.com/aced/chrono/c1900s/yr50/fthailand1952.htm
- ^Malaysia’s race rules. The Economist Newspaper Limited (2005-08-25). Requires login.
- ^明清对待海外华人的不同态度
- ^海外汉人被屠杀的血泪史大全
- ^十七﹒八世紀海外華人慘案初探
- ^东南亚华人遭受的几次屠杀
- ^南洋华人被大规模屠杀不完全记录
- ^Indonesian academics fight burning of books on 1965 coup, smh.com.au
- ^ Vickers (2005), p. 158
- ^BBC News | Analysis|Indonesia: Why ethnic Chinese are afraid
- ^“No More Chinese!”, Tongatapu.net
- ^“Tonga announces the expulsion of hundreds of Chinese immigrants”, John Braddock, WSWS, December 18, 2001
- ^ ab“The Pacific Proxy: China vs Taiwan”, Graeme Dobell, ABC Radio Australia, February 7, 2007
- ^“Chinese stores looted in Tonga riots”, People’s Daily, November 17, 2006
- ^ Avery, Martha (2003). The Tea Road: China and Russia Meet Across the Steppe. 五洲传播出版社. p. 91.
- ^ Bulag, Uradyn E. (December 2004). “Mongolian Modernity and Hybridity”. Minpaku (National Museum of Ethnology (Osaka)) (19): 1–3.
- ^NZZ: Die Mongolen bestimmen einen neuen Präsidenten (in German): “Die Kampagne des bisherigen Amtsinhabers Enkhbayar hatte an chauvinistische Gefühle appelliert und dem Gegenkandidaten Elbegdorj mehr oder weniger direkt unterstellt, chinesische Vorfahren und damit «kein reines mongolisches Blut» zu haben.”
- ^ Tania Branigan, 2 August 2010, Mongolian neo-Nazis: Anti-Chinese sentiment fuels rise of ultra-nationalism, Guardian UK
- ^ Santoli, Al (2001-01-29). “Russian far east residents fear takeover by China; Sino-Russian “strategic cooperation” pact aimed at US”. American Foreign Policy Council. Archived from the original on 2007-11-16. Retrieved 2008-03-25.
- ^ Baker, Peter (2003-08-02). “Russians fear Chinese ‘takeover’ of Far East regions”. Dawn (newspaper). Retrieved 2008-03-25.[dead link]
- ^Kazin, Michael; Edwards, Rebecca; Rothman, Adam (2010). “Immigration Policy”. The Princeton Encyclopedia of American Political History. Princeton University Press. “Compared to its European counterparts, Chinese immigration of the late nineteenth century was minuscule (4 percent of all immigration at its zenith), but it inspired one of the most brutal and successful nativist movements in U.S. history. Official and popular racism made Chinese newcomers especially vulnerable; their lack of numbers, political power, or legal protections gave them none of the weapons that enabled Irish Catholics to counterattack nativists.”
- ^ Young, Jason. “Review of East by South: China in the Australasian Imagination” (.doc). Victoria University of Wellington. Retrieved 2008-03-24.
- ^Canada (2006). “Address by the Prime Minister on the Chinese Head Tax Redress”. Government of Canada. Retrieved 2006-08-08.
- ^Sympatico / MSN : News : CTV.ca: PM apologizes in House of Commons for head tax
- ^ Norton, Henry K. (1924). The Story of California From the Earliest Days to the Present. Chicago: A.C. McClurg & Co. pp. 283–296.
- ^ See, e.g., http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/5046/%7C
- ^ Ling, Huping (2004). Chinese St. Louis: From Enclave to Cultural Community. Temple University Press. p. 68. “The murder of Elsie Sigel immediately grabbed the front pages of newspapers, which portrayed Chinese men as dangerous to “innocent” and “virtuous” young white women. This murder led to a surge in the harassment of Chinese in communities across the United States.”
- ^Gompers, Samuel; Gustadt, Herman (1902). Meat vs. Rice: American Manhood against Asiatic Coolieism: Which Shall Survive?. American Federation of Labor.
- ^Lai, Him Mark; Hsu, Madeline Y. (2010). Chinese American Transnational Politics. University of Illinois Press. pp. 53–54.
- ^“An Evidentiary Timeline on the History of Sacramento’s Chinatown: 1882 – American Sinophobia, The Chinese Exclusion Act and “The Driving Out”". Friends of the Yee Fow Museum, Sacramento, California. Retrieved 2008-03-24.
- ^ Chin, Gabriel J.. “Harlan, Chinese and Chinese Americans”. University of Dayton Law School.
- ^ Bowman, Laurel. “US Campaign Attack Ads Take Aim at China”. VOA News.
- ^ ab Chi, Frank (2010-11-08). “In campaign ads, China is fair game; Chinese-Americans are not”. The Boston Globe.
- ^ ab Lyden, Jacki (2010-10-27). “Critics Say Political Ads Hint Of Xenophobia”. NPR. Retrieved 2010-12-05.
- ^ Yang, Jeff (2010-10-27). “Politicians Play The China Card”. Tell Me More (NPR). Retrieved 2010-12-05.
- ^ ab Smith, Ben (2010-10-22). “Behind The Chinese Professor”.
- ^ Fallows, James (2010-10-21). “The Phenomenal Chinese Professor Ad”.
- ^“The Year China-Bashing Went Mainstream”, New Yorker. http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/evanosnos/2012/11/the-year-that-china-bashing-went-mainstream.html
- ^“The Year China-Bashing Went Mainstream”, New Yorker. http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/evanosnos/2012/11/the-year-that-china-bashing-went-mainstream.html
- ^“The Year China-Bashing Went Mainstream”, New Yorker. http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/evanosnos/2012/11/the-year-that-china-bashing-went-mainstream.html
- ^http://english.aljazeera.net/news/africa/2011/09/2011922234557755338.html
Further reading
- McClain, Charles J. (1996). In Search of Equality: The Chinese Struggle Against Discrimination in Nineteenth-Century America. University of California Press.
- Ward, W. Peter (2002). White Canada Forever: Popular Attitudes and Public Policy Toward Orientals in British Columbia. McGill-Queen’s Press. 3rd edition.
- Aarim-Heriot, Najia (2003). Chinese Immigrants, African Americans, and Racial Anxiety in the United States, 1848-82. University of Illinois Press.
- Chua, Amy. (2004). World on Fire: How Exporting Free Market Democracy Breeds Ethnic Hatred and Global Instability. Random House Digital, Inc.
- Ferrall, Charles; Millar, Paul; Smith, Keren. (eds) (2005). East by South: China in the Australasian imagination. Victoria University Press.
- Mungello, David E. (2009). The Great Encounter of China and the West, 1500-1800. Rowman & Littlefield.
About 7,180 results (0.35 seconds)Search Results
OECD: Don’t Mess With China | elcidharth
elcidharth.com/2013/03/24/oecd-dont-mess-with-china/3 days ago – OECD: China will overtake U.S. as world’s biggest economy by 2016; Report says will be top economy after accounting for price differences …China Bashed, Oops, Unabashed | elcidharth
elcidharth.com/2013/03/15/9105/Mar 15, 2013 – In a new essay collection, My First Trip to China, distinguished China watchers evoke the world’s most dynamic economy as it used to be.China-Russia Bhai-Bhai | elcidharth
elcidharth.com/2013/03/15/9118/Mar 15, 2013 – The new Chinese leader chose Russia as first stop on his maiden overseas voyage. As this visit signals the two powerful neighbors growing …China Syndrome and I | elcidharth
elcidharth.com/2013/03/21/china-syndrome-and-i/5 days ago – China’s air pollution has been bad lately. Really, really bad. We’ve posted photos of it before, but the above shot really drives home how severe …Bye, Bye India, Hello China | elcidharth
elcidharth.com/2013/03/09/8489/Mar 9, 2013 – Until recently, India saw itself as an emerging economic powerhouse, the next China so to speak. Those delusions of grandeur led to …The Economist: Honk if you Hate China | elcidharth
elcidharth.com/2013/…/the-economist-honk-if-you-hate-china…Feb 21, 2013 – TYLER COWEN says he “still [does] not believe that the Chinese‘recovery’ is for real”. He quotes a recent Financial Times story, which reads in …China | elcidharth | Page 9
elcidharth.com/tag/china/page/9/Mar 11, 2013 – Dec 19, 2012 – For bonus reading this year, I also want to call out a wonderful collection of books by FP’s friends and family. Foreign Policy’s …Chinese Gulags and I | elcidharth
elcidharth.com/2013/02/24/7108/Feb 24, 2013 – In China, democracy and Laogai are incompatible. … The Foundation’s purpose is to gather information on the Chinese Laogai – the most …China | elcidharth
elcidharth.com/tag/china/Mar 18, 2013 – Solar stocks, the most volatile Chinese equities in New York, will extend declines as Suntech Power Holdings Co. (STP)’s bankruptcy stokes …China’s Property Bubble Burst | elcidharth
elcidharth.com/2013/02/25/chinas…burst/comment-page-1/Feb 25, 2013 – China stocks dropped sharply Monday after Beijing stepped up efforts to rein in the property market ahead of the central government’s annual …